is a amd 64 a better prossesor than the equivellant pentium prossecor?

is a amd 64 a better prossesor than the equivellant pentium prossecor?

AMD seem to be to handle 3D apps better than Pentiums, they are appeal for money as apposed to Intel, I have used AMD adjectives the time, without any probs at adjectives, its a matter of choice/preference at the running out of the day.
That is a query that will have a different answer by every user, its adjectives depending on what you want. Think of it like this, the pentium processors are powerful but the mode they are represented isn't true to their actual power. They will throw up 3.4 or 3.6 ghz but they will not always execute at this. While at the same time the AMD 64 processors are accurate in their own style because they will generally state the speed the processor will run at constantly earlier sale, along next to good fsb (front side bus) and bsb (back side bus) speeds. If you are trying to determine between the two of them and it is for a multimedia or gaming purpose computer the best item to look at is which has the larger stern side bus speed which is what will effect your gaming/multimedia processes the most. Better is all up to the user, although i've achieve better overclocking results with the amd so I usually chose them (they're also more fiscally feasible)
they are both the same as far as power and compatibility!

amd is more activity power than office tho
Every Day of the Week!

AMD are better!

Do you ever see a AMD advert on the TV?
AMD pack more per GHz than Intel processors, and is much more cost-efficient at doing so.