Is a 2.2Ghz Dual Core processor really 3.7Ghz?

For computer techs: do you certainly feel a 2.2Ghz dual core should be sold as a 3.7Ghz computer? Or a 2.4 D.C. be sold as a 4.45Ghz?



(2.2G DC next to run 2 threats of info at 2.2 each - but in attendance are actually graphics programs and games that want a patch or the DC will actually run them too slow)



Personally thinking this is flat out false hoarding and would like other's thoughts. Thanks

Is a 2.2Ghz Dual Core processor really 3.7Ghz?

Hmmm, underneath what sort of rules can you describe a 2.2 GHz processor as 3.7GHz? You can describe it as having production in some circumstances that match some mythical 3.7GHz processor... like Athlon's rating (= mythical K7 running at said speed... or be it a K6? Whatever, anyone ever seen a 3.2GHz Pentium?)



To say-so that a dual-core 2.2 is a 3.7 is BS. It's only get a throughput equivalent if it's running a perfectly load-sharing application.
I contemplate it's labeled correctly.



I sometimes split out the processors, so that one is dedicated to a given program (like SQL). The other processor is departed for all other programs. In this bag, I get a 2.2 processor, and another 2.2 processor.